Wikivir:Pod lipo

Iz Wikivira, proste knjižnice besedil v javni lasti
(Preusmerjeno s strani Portal občestva)
Skoči na: navigacija, iskanje
Pod lipo

januar 2007 · januar 2008 · januar 2009 · januar 2010 · julij 2013 · julij 2014


  • zadnje čase se nič kaj ne dogaja

Ločitev imena in priimka v predlogi avtor[uredi]

Predlagam, da v predlogi {{avtor}} uvedemo parameter priimek. Pri tem bi parameter ime ostal, vendar bi vseboval samo osebno ime brez priimka. Ločitev imena in priimka nudi boljše metapodatke za nadaljnjo obdelavo, prav tako pa se s tem lahko znebimo parametra zadnja začetnica z uporabo modula Modul:String in kode {{#invoke:String|sub|s=Prešeren|i=1|j=1}}, ki vrne: P. --Domen (pogovor) 12:18, 29. junij 2014 (UTC)

Jaz sem za, čeprav ne razumem povsem natančno te tehnike. Najbolje, da kar spremeniš, pa se potem pokažejo prednosti. Spotoma še to: Na Wikiviru in Wikinavedku (morda še kje) v glavnem meniju ni na voljo zvezdice za osveževanje strani. Lahko to kako dodaš? Morda bi bilo še dobro, če ne bi bil samo znak *, ampak bi pisalo kar »Osveži«. --Janezdrilc (pogovor) 14:36, 29. junij 2014 (UTC)

Je ta zvezdica mogoče rešena z JavaScriptom? --Domen (pogovor) 12:07, 1. julij 2014 (UTC)

Uh, to pa ne vem. Bom rekel še Yerpu pod lipo na Wikipediji. Vidim, da je tudi pri drugih wikiprojektih treba meni posodobit, ker ima vsak kaj posebnega. --Janezdrilc (pogovor) 14:58, 2. julij 2014 (UTC)

IMPORTANT: Admin activity review[uredi]

Hello. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc) was recently adopted by global community consensus (your community received a notice about the discussion). According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on smaller wikis. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the new admin activity review here.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

  1. Wailer (administrator, bureaucrat)

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, Rschen7754 22:47, 18. julij 2014 (UTC)

Spremembe na glavni strani[uredi]

Glede na to, da nimamo izbranih besedil in je na glavni strani razdelek Izbrano izvirno besedilo že nekaj časa prazen, predlagam, da ga odstranimo in na njegovo mesto postavimo razdelek z novostmi. --Domen (pogovor) 14:43, 19. julij 2014 (UTC)

Zaenkrat sem shranil eno novejše besedilo. Vseeno se mi zdi škoda ukinit tako predstavitev na glavni strani. --Janezdrilc (pogovor) 13:20, 24. julij 2014 (UTC)

Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decisions[uredi]

The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.

If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on

-- JurgenNL (talk) 17:35, 21. avgust 2014 (UTC)

Process ideas for software development[uredi]

’’My apologies for writing in English.’’


I am notifying you that a brainstorming session has been started on Meta to help the Wikimedia Foundation increase and better affect community participation in software development across all wiki projects. Basically, how can you be more involved in helping to create features on Wikimedia projects? We are inviting all interested users to voice their ideas on how communities can be more involved and informed in the product development process at the Wikimedia Foundation. It would be very appreciated if you could translate this message to help inform your local communities as well.

I and the rest of my team welcome you to participate. We hope to see you on Meta.

Kind regards, -- Rdicerb (WMF) talk 22:15, 21. avgust 2014 (UTC)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Grants to improve your project[uredi]

Apologies for English. Please help translate this message.

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants program is accepting proposals for funding new experiments from September 1st to 30th. Your idea could improve Wikimedia projects with a new tool or gadget, a better process to support community-building on your wiki, research on an important issue, or something else we haven't thought of yet. Whether you need $200 or $30,000 USD, Individual Engagement Grants can cover your own project development time in addition to hiring others to help you.

Change in renaming process[uredi]

Part or all of this message may be in English. Please help translate if possible.

-- User:Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:22, 9. september 2014 (UTC)

Meta RfCs on two new global groups[uredi]

Hello all,

There are currently requests for comment open on meta to create two new global groups. The first is a group for members of the OTRS permissions queue, which would grant them autopatrolled rights on all wikis except those who opt-out. That proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Creation of a global OTRS-permissions user group. The second is a group for Wikimedia Commons admins and OTRS agents to view deleted file pages through the 'viewdeletedfile' right on all wikis except those who opt-out. The second proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Global file deletion review.

We would like to hear what you think on both proposals. Both are in English; if you wanted to translate them into your native language that would also be appreciated.

It is possible for individual projects to opt-out, so that users in those groups do not have any additional rights on those projects. To do this please start a local discussion, and if there is consensus you can request to opt-out of either or both at m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Thanks and regards, Ajraddatz (talk) 18:04, 26. oktober 2014 (UTC)

Global AbuseFilter[uredi]


AbuseFilter is a MediaWiki extension used to detect likely abusive behavior patterns, like pattern vandalism and spam. In 2013, Global AbuseFilters were enabled on a limited set of wikis including Meta-Wiki,, Wikispecies and (in early 2014) all the "small wikis". Recently, global abuse filters were enabled on "medium sized wikis" as well. These filters are currently managed by stewards on Meta-Wiki and have shown to be very effective in preventing mass spam attacks across Wikimedia projects. However, there is currently no policy on how the global AbuseFilters will be managed although there are proposals. There is an ongoing request for comment on policy governing the use of the global AbuseFilters. In the meantime, specific wikis can opt out of using the global AbuseFilter. These wikis can simply add a request to this list on Meta-Wiki. More details can be found on this page at Meta-Wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on m:Talk:Global AbuseFilter.


PiRSquared17, Glaisher

— 17:36, 14. november 2014 (UTC)